| Tropical
Cyclones
[Index] |
Monthly Global Tropical Cyclone Summary May 2000 [Summaries and Track Data] [Prepared by Gary Padgett] |
MONTHLY GLOBAL TROPICAL CYCLONE SUMMARY
MAY, 2000
(For general comments about the nature of these summaries, as well as
information on how to download the tabular cyclone track files, see
the Author's Note at the end of this summary.)
***********************************************************************
MAY HIGHLIGHTS
--> Short-lived intense super typhoon churns Western Pacific waters
--> First Eastern Pacific hurricane forms
***********************************************************************
NEW FEATURE - TOPIC OF THE MONTH
I am planning to add a new feature to these monthly summaries, a
sort of "topic of the month" article, discussing some interesting
topic in the tropical cyclone arena. I don't intend for this feature
to be very lengthy--just a few paragraphs at most. For some subjects
I may be able to provide links and/or addresses where interested
persons can look for more information.
***** Topic of the Month for May *****
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE NEUTERCANE?
As a result of some conversations I found myself involved in at the
recent AMS 24th Conference on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology in
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, I learned that there are quite a few younger
meteorologists and graduate students (and some not quite so young)
that have never heard the term "neutercane", or if they had, had no
idea what it was or when it made its brief sojourn into the annals of
North Atlantic weather history. Simply put, the word was coined by
former NHC Director Dr. Robert Simpson to describe a certain class of
small, mesoscale subtropical cyclones that usually form in horizontal
shear zones near dying cold fronts or else near the centers of old,
occluded extratropical cyclones (what Paul Hebert termed a Type B
subtropical cyclone).
In 1972 NHC began issuing public subtropical cyclone bulletins and
designated the storms with the phonetic alphabet. In late May of that
year a larger subtropical cyclone off the southeastern U. S. coast was
dubbed Alpha but the term neutercane was not publicly used. However,
in late August a small subtropical cyclone formed in the western
Atlantic and bulletins were issued for Neutercane Bravo. (Bravo
eventually developed full tropical characteristics and was redesignated
Hurricane Betty west of the Azores.) In late September another
similar system was named Neutercane Charlie.
However, Dr. Simpson retired in 1973 (I believe I'm correct here)
with Dr. Neil Frank assuming the directorship of NHC, and the term was
not publicly used again. Subtropical cyclones were designated with
the phonetic alphabet that year (with Subtropical Cyclone Bravo in
October evolving into Hurricane Fran), but in 1974 that practice was
dropped also. Many years ago I read an article in the Bulletin of
the AMS dealing with cyclone classification, and the neutercane was
mentioned. The writer of that article raised a couple of objections
to the term: (1) the use of "cane" as a syllable implies that
hurricane is a compound word, which it is not; and (2) "neuter" has to
do with gender, not an intermediate quality between two opposites or
extremes (the proper term for that is "neutral").
In spite of its official usage in only one hurricane season, the
neutercane received a fair amount of publicity. I have in an old
scrapbook a newspaper clipping with the headline "Satellite Spots
Sea-Going Storm That's Half Hurricane, Half Tornado"! The World
Almanac for 1973 had a short article describing the neutercane, and
the word found its way into some dictionaries. This apparently has
been sufficient to keep the term alive to some degree, as I have seen
it crop up in various places over the years, especially in some
informal discussions and e-mails.
Next Month: A Source for State and Local Hurricane Histories
***********************************************************************
ACTIVITY BY BASINS
ATLANTIC (ATL) - North Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico
Activity for May: 1 subtropical depression
Atlantic Activity for May
-------------------------
The month of May lies outside the nominal hurricane season in the
Atlantic basin, although since 1886 twelve tropical storms, including
three of hurricane intensity, have been tracked. The last named
tropical storm in the Atlantic basin was Tropical Storm Arlene in 1981
which formed in the northwestern Caribbean on 5 May. There have been
several years since (1987, 1988, 1990, 1993) in which a tropical
depression formed late in the month, but none of these were able to
intensify to tropical storm intensity. However, subtropical (hybrid)
activity tends to be more frequent during the month and 2000 was no
exception.
Michael Pitt sent me some information on a LOW-pressure area on
19-21 May which formed a few hundred miles southeast of Bermuda. The
Air Force Weather Association issued Dvorak satellite classifications
on this LOW for about a day and a half, and TPC/NHC referred to it in
their Tropical Weather Discussions as a complex system with an upper-
level LOW with supporting fronts and an associated surface LOW. A
track for this system was included in the May cyclone tracks file.
Michael later sent me some excerpts from TPC/NHC Discussions which
I forwarded to David Roth, a meteorologist at HPC. David researched
the system and sent me a GOES infrared image of the system taken at
0015 UTC on 20 May. In that picture the LOW appears as a typical
subtropical-type system with a band of convection somewhat removed
from the center extending from the northwest quadrant around to the
eastern side of the LOW. According to David the system entered the
subtropical phase on 19 May when moisture and temperature gradients
were disappearing. In David's estimation peak winds around the system
were 30 kts during the initial non-tropical phase and about 25 kts
during the subtropical phase. The system began to shear on the 21st
and 22nd as it drifted eastward, and lost its closed circulation
soon after 22/0600 UTC. (A special thanks to Michael and David for
the information they provided on this system.)
***********************************************************************
NORTHEAST PACIFIC (NEP) - North Pacific Ocean East of Longitude 180
Activity for May: 1 hurricane
NOTE: Much of the information presented below was obtained from the
TPC/NHC discussion bulletins issued with every regular advisory (CPHC
for locations west of 140W.) All references to sustained winds imply
a 1-min averaging period unless otherwise noted.
Northeast Pacific Activity for May
----------------------------------
The Northeast Pacific tropical season got started a little earlier
than normal in 2000. Since 1966 (the year that is considered to have
been the beginning of complete operational satellite coverage) the
first Eastern Pacific tropical storm has appeared in May sixteen times
(including 2000). Of the 35 years from 1966 through 2000, in only
seven seasons did the first tropical storm appear earlier in the month
than this year's Hurricane Aletta.
The write-up for Hurricane Aletta was prepared by John Wallace, a
student at the University of Texas in San Antonio who has had a keen
interest in tropical cyclones and climatology for several years.
Although he didn't initially plan to, John tells me that now he is
seriously considering majoring in meteorology. John is interested
in tropical climatology and patterns of storm formation, and has a
special interest in the Northeast Pacific region. Last year he wrote
for me the narrative for Tropical Storm Irwin in October, the final
storm of the 1999 season in the Northeast Pacific. A special thanks
to John for writing the Aletta summary--it helped me out enormously.
(John has already sent me his write-ups for Bud and Carlotta in June,
so hopefully I'll be able to get the June summary out a little earlier
than usual.)
Hurricane Aletta (TC-01E)
22 - 28 May
--------------------------
Hurricane Aletta was the first May "named" storm since 1996.
However, the 1996 storm was retroactively upgraded to storm status
(i.e.,unnamed). With this in mind, Aletta was the first May storm
actually warned on as a tropical storm since 1991. It was the first
May hurricane since 1990, and the strongest May hurricane since 1983's
Hurricane Adolph, which peaked at 95 kts--the current record-holder
for intensity in May since the beginning of the era of complete
satellite coverage in the late 1960s.
A tropical LOW developed in the wake of an easterly wave late in
the second week of May. The LOW generated only sporadic convection
through the 21st and remained nearly stationary during that time.
Even so, by 0000 UTC on 20 May there was definite loose, spiral
banding, while the convection fluctuated in an apparent diurnal
bursting pattern. The synoptic conditions were favorable for
development, with light shear, modest ridging aloft, very warm SSTs,
and no dry air intrusion at the mid- to upper-levels. Though
convection was strong on the 20th, it weakened greatly on the 21st,
so much so that it looked for a moment like the LOW would not
develop, though conditions became increasingly favorable. Satellite
presentation notwithstanding, the estimated CP of the LOW was stable
at 1008 mb from the 20th through late on the 21st.
There was a dramatic nocturnal increase in convection starting at
0600 UTC on 22 May, concurrent with the development of a slow easterly
track. Between 0600 and 1400 UTC, the LOW deepened and changed from a
broad spiral of low clouds to a robust, well-organized cyclone with a
CDO nearly centered over the LLCC. The LOW was upgraded to Tropical
Depression One-E at 1500 UTC on 22 May when the center was located
about 225 nm south-southeast of Acapulco. Conditions were highly
favorable for further development as an upper-level anticyclone
centered itself over the depression. The cyclone's west-northwesterly
track was influenced by a mid-level ridge to its north, and this was
forecast to keep it parallel to but safely offshore from Mexico until
a strong trough to the northwest was expected to induce a more
northerly motion. The track on the whole was expected to conform
closely to climatology.
The depression intensified slowly through the 22nd and into the
23rd; its forward speed decreased by almost half accordingly as
steering currents weakened. By 0900 UTC on 23 May Tropical
Depression One-E was upgraded to Tropical Storm Aletta as the Dvorak
T-number reached 2.5. The newly-named tropical storm was located
about 315 nm south-southeast of Manzanillo, Mexico. The track,
initially parallel to the Mexican coast, changed to a more westerly
one as storm intensity was reached. The last public advisory was
issued since the storm now presented no significant threat to the
mainland. Conditions remained favorable for slow strengthening, though
University of Wisconsin CIMSS data indicated seemingly more favorable
conditions than NHC noted in its advisories.
Convection intensified and overall organization increased markedly
after the upgrade, though the center remained difficult to locate in
the developing storm. Aletta's central pressure fell a respectable
15 mb in the 24 hours from 1500 UTC on 23 May to 1500 UTC on the
24th, when the storm was upgraded to hurricane status about 300 nm
south-southwest of Manzanillo. A diffuse, cloud-filled eye was
apparent in visible imagery by 1745 UTC on the 24th; a TRMM overpass
at 1609 UTC confirmed a 30-nm diameter eye. A SSM/I overpass at the
same time showed a closed eyewall, though it disappeared on visible
and infrared imagery soon after.
Hurricane Aletta intensified quickly, reaching its peak 90-kt MSW
and CP of 970 mb just 18 hours later, at 0900 UTC on 25 May, roughly
275 nm southeast of Socorro Island. It briefly sustained this
intensity until 1500 UTC when a slow weakening trend began. The
intensification trend occurred even though synoptic conditions were
less favorable than they had been earlier. The upper-level
anticyclone that fostered Aletta's initial development had weakened
slightly and moved north over Mexico by 0000 UTC on the 24th, creating
light easterly shear. The SSTs were still warm, however, and there
was no entrainment of stable air. Soon after Aletta peaked in
intensity, the CDO became less symmetric as convection was displaced
west of the center by easterly shear, exposing the center and low-level
banding in its eastern semicircle. Strong low-level southwesterly flow
exacerbated the easterly shear. The beginning of the weakening trend
coincided with an almost complete collapse of steering winds. Aletta
was already embedded in a broad col between a strong subtropical ridge
over the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean, and the Pacific subtropical
ridge far to the west; a strong upper-level trough west of Baja
California, well to the northwest, had eroded the mid-level ridge to
the north that had provided most of Aletta's steering. The stall was
well-forecast by certain models, but caught the NHC official forecasts
slightly by surprise. Aletta became quasi-stationary by 0000 UTC on
the 26th, and scarcely moved until the last advisory was issued.
Aletta became increasingly ragged on the 26th as the shear became
more northeasterly. The upper-level anticyclone responsible for the
shear had weakened since Aletta's peak, but was apparently strong
enough to make life difficult for the weakening hurricane. Aletta
weakened very rapidly on the 27th, dropping below hurricane intensity
by 0300 UTC, and to a depression by 1500 UTC when no deep convection
remained. The last advisory on the weak, low-level vortex was issued
at 0300 UTC on 28 May, as it drifted northward to cooler waters. An
ill-defined, mid- to low-level vortex persisted in the same location
until 1 Jun, after which the remnant circulation was unidentifiable in
any satellite channel.
Aletta's rapid weakening trend is a minor mystery. Shear over the
system was not strong, and by the time Aletta had dissipated was
actually favorable. Water vapor imagery from 1200 UTC on 26 May
shows northeastward advection of moisture from Aletta's vicinity,
but this jet apparently had little or no direct impact on the storm.
There was no evidence of entrainment of more stable air--as evidenced
in visible imagery by extensive stratiform clouds--if it was a culprit,
it was subtle. Nor was there any evidence of dry air entrainment in
water vapor imagery. However, water vapor imagery from 1200 UTC on
27 May showed that the moisture content of the atmosphere over Aletta's
rough position was slightly drier than that of its surroundings. The
import of this on Aletta's dissipation is unknown, or indeed if it was
even a real feature. If it was a real feature, though, it would indeed
be unfavorable, perhaps indicating subsidence. Imagery from 1215 UTC
the following day suggests it was a real feature. As for SSTs, they
were not unfavorably cool, roughly 27 C; anomaly imagery shows little
significant upwelling, a surprise given Aletta's stall. A minor
mystery, but enough to pique the curiosity.
No casualties or damage are known from Aletta at this time. The
storm did briefly present the threat of heavy coastal rains to Mexico,
but as the system was compact these apparently did not occur.
NOTE from Gary: I let John's next-to-last paragraph stand basically
as he wrote it--exploring reasons why Aletta weakened so rapidly in
the absence of any obvious hostile environmental factors. I have
since learned from Jack Beven that Richard Pasch, in his preliminary
report on the storm, concluded that upwelling after all was likely the
primary culprit contributing to the rapid weakening of Aletta on
26 and 27 May.
***********************************************************************
NORTHWEST PACIFIC (NWP) - North Pacific Ocean West of Longitude 180
Activity for May: 2 tropical depressions
1 tropical storm
1 super typhoon
NOTE: Most of the information on each cyclone's history presented in
the narrative will be based upon JTWC's advisories, and references to
winds should be understood as a 1-min avg MSW unless otherwise noted.
However, in the accompanying tracking document I have made comparisons
of coordinates with JMA (Japan) and the Philippines (PAGASA) when their
positions differed from JTWC's by usually 40-50 nm or more. A special
thanks to Michael V. Padua, owner of the Typhoon 2000 website, for
sending me the PAGASA and JMA tracks.
In the title line for each storm I plan to reference all the cyclone
names/numbers I have available: JTWC's depression number, the
JMA-assigned name (if any), JMA's tropical storm numeric designator,
and PAGASA's name for systems forming in or passing through their area
of responsibility.
Northwest Pacific Activity for May
----------------------------------
After lying quiet for the first four months of the year, the North-
west Pacific suddenly became quite active, producing one of the most
intense super typhoons ever noted during the month of May. Three
other tropical depressions formed, but only one of these attained
tropical storm intensity. Damrey and Longwang became the first storms
to be named from the roster of Asian typhoon names. (More information
on these new names can be found in the global summary for December,
1999.)
Tropical Depression 03W (named Konsing by PAGASA) formed on 20 May
about 300 nm southeast of Hong Kong (or roughly the same distance
northwest of Manila). This depression never generated winds higher
than 30 kts as it moved east-northeastward through the Luzon Strait.
The final warning (from PAGASA) at 22/0600 UTC placed the weakening
center about 300 nm east-northeast of the southern tip of Taiwan.
Tropical Depression 04W formed on 30 May in the South China Sea
just off the coast of southern Vietnam about 200 nm south-southeast of
Da Nang. This weak system drifted generally north-northwestward,
paralleling the Vietnamese coast. Maximum winds were estimated at
no more than 25 kts most of the time, briefly reaching 30 kts at
1200 and 1800 UTC on the 31st. The final JTWC warning at 1800 UTC
on 1 Jun placed the dissipating center just off the coast in the Gulf
of Tonkin about 175 nm south-southeast of Hanoi. JTWC was the only
warning agency to issue bulletins on this system.
Super Typhoon Damrey (TC-01W / TY 0001 / Asiang)
5 - 12 May
-------------------------------------------------
The waters of the Western North Pacific were quiet for the first
four months of 2000, but then exploded with a bang. The first
tropical depression of the year became the first tropical storm,
which then became the first typhoon, which in turn became the first
super typhoon and the second strongest May typhoon on record (dating
back to 1945). Capt. Jim Parsons, a Typhoon Duty Officer at JTWC,
checked the JTWC Best Track database and also the consolidated world-
wide Tropical Cyclone database (maintained at the National
Climatological Data Center in Asheville, North Carolina), and
reported that the only May typhoon to have exceeded Damrey's peak
intensity of 155 kts was Typhoon Phyllis in 1958 (160 kts). Also,
Typhoon Iris in May, 1951, reached a peak intensity of 150 kts. But
the opinion has often been expressed that many of the MSW estimates in
earlier years were too high, so the possibility exists that Damrey
was in fact the most intense May typhoon on record. (A special thanks
to Jim for looking this up for me.)
On 3 May JTWC issued a STWO at 1400 UTC which indicated that an
area of convection had developed south of Yap and had persisted for
more than 18 hours. A QuikScat pass indicated a broad, weak LLCC
with good outflow. A few hours later the center of action was
determined to be farther west--about 125 nm southeast of Palau--with
convection increasing in areal coverage. The system's potential for
development was upgraded to Fair. The area of convection passed over
Palau around 04/0600 UTC, and at 2330 UTC JTWC issued a Formation
Alert. The LLCC was partially exposed with most of the convection
to the west of the center which was embedded in the monsoon trough.
The disturbance continued to trek slowly northwestward on 5 May,
gradually becoming better organized, and JTWC issued the first warning
on Tropical Depression 01W at 1800 UTC with the center estimated to be
located about 250 nm north-northwest of Palau. PAGASA initiated
warnings at 0000 UTC on 6 May (naming the depression Asiang), and
JMA began issuing warnings at 0600 UTC.
TD-01W continued to move slowly northwestward on 6 May. By 1200 UTC
animated imagery showed that the system was rapidly intensifying and
JTWC upgraded the depression to a tropical storm with 40-kt winds,
located about 325 nm north-northwest of Palau. PAGASA upgraded the
system to a 35-kt tropical storm (10-min avg winds) at 1800 UTC, and
JMA followed suit at 07/0000 UTC, naming the storm Damrey. JTWC had
increased the MSW to 60 kts by this time, based upon satellite
intensity estimates of 55 and 65 kts. Animated imagery showed that
Damrey was continuing to organize and had developed outflow channels
to the north and south of the system. JTWC upgraded Damrey to a
typhoon at 07/0600 UTC when the center was located about 450 nm east
of Catanduanes Island in the Philippines. Damrey by this time had
moved into a weakness in the subtropical ridge and was moving very
slowly in a general northward direction. The MSW estimate reached
75 kts at 1800 UTC with the storm now drifting very slowly northeast-
ward. A TRMM pass at 1819 UTC suggested that a weak eye feature was
beginning to form with a strong convective band to the north and west
of the LLCC.
JMA upgraded Damrey to a typhoon at 08/0000 UTC. At 0600 UTC a
banding eye was visible in animated satellite imagery as well as in
SSM/I imagery. The typhoon had reached the westernmost point in its
track around 0000 UTC on 8 May when it was centered about 425 nm east
of Catanduanes Island. From this point onward Damrey's motion was
always to the northeast or east-northeast. By 1800 UTC a 17-nm
diameter ragged eye was visible and the typhoon was beginning to
rapidly intensify as it had moved underneath the upper-level ridge
axis. JTWC increased the MSW to 105 kts based upon Dvorak estimates
of 102 and 115 kts. (JMA's 10-min avg MSW estimate at this time was
75 kts.) Damrey continued to deepen and by 0600 UTC on the 9th
had reached super typhoon intensity of 130 kts about 600 nm west of
Saipan. The storm had picked up some in forward speed and was
moving northeastward at 13 kts. Satellite imagery revealed a round,
cloud-free eye approximately 8 nm in diameter with impressive outflow
in all quadrants. Based upon current intensity estimates of 140 and
155 kts, JTWC further increased the MSW to 150 kts at 1200 UTC. Damrey
at this time displayed a 14-nm wide cloud-free eye with two convective
bands approximately 200 nm and 320 nm east of the eye, respectively.
Super Typhoon Damrey reached its estimated peak intensity of 155 kts
at 1800 UTC on 9 May. The storm at that time was centered roughly
600 nm west-northwest of Guam or about 450 nm southwest of Iwo Jima,
moving northeastward at 16 kts. In terms of areal extent Damrey was a
rather small typhoon. At its peak gales extended outward 170 nm to
the southeast and 135 nm elsewhere. The radii of 50-kt winds were
100 nm to the southeast and 65 nm elsewhere, and 100-kt winds were
confined to within about 20 nm of the center. The peak 10-min avg
MSW assigned to the storm by JMA was 90 kts from 09/1200 UTC through
10/0000 UTC, and the minimum CP (also from JMA) was 930 mb.
As is often the case with small tropical cyclones, Damrey weakened
even more quickly than it had intensified. Six hours after peak
intensity was reached, JTWC lowered the MSW to 140 kts as the storm was
beginning to show signs of weakening in an environment of increased
vertical shear. The eye had become ragged and cloud-filled. By
0600 UTC on 10 May animated visible imagery revealed that deep
convection had decreased dramatically over the western half of the
system. Damrey had moved north of the upper-level anticyclone and
moderate to strong southwesterlies overlay the storm. The typhoon's
center at this time was about 300 nm southwest of Iwo Jima and winds
had dropped to 105 kts. By 1800 UTC there was little deep convection
associated with the LLCC, and by 11/0000 UTC, only 30 hours after
reaching its peak intensity, Damrey had weakened back to tropical
storm intensity of 60 kts. (This is per JTWC's assessment. During
the decay phase JMA's 10-min avg MSW estimates were somewhat higher
than JTWC's reported 1-min avg MSW values. JMA maintained Damrey as
a typhoon through 11/0600 UTC, and was still reporting 50 kts at
12/0000 UTC when JTWC's MSW estimate was only 35 kts.)
Caught up in southwesterly flow and in a hostile vertical shear
environment, Damrey continued to gradually accelerate to the northeast
as it weakened. By 0000 UTC on the 11th the LLCC had become exposed
with convection being sheared to the northeast. Damrey passed about
30 nm northwest of Iwo Jima at 0600 UTC with 45-kt winds, moving
northeastward at 16 kts. By 0000 UTC on 12 May the former super
typhoon was a minimal tropical storm located about 300 nm northeast of
Iwo Jima and moving to the east-northeast at 20 kts. JTWC wrote its
final warning at 0600 UTC, and (per JMA) Damrey was becoming extra-
tropical at 1200 UTC about 525 nm east-northeast of Iwo Jima.
Fortunately, this brief but very intense typhoon did not (to the
author's knowledge) affect any populated areas.
Tropical Storm Longwang (TC-02W / TS 0002 / Biring)
18 - 20 May
---------------------------------------------------
On 16 May a broad, weak LLCC was located in the northern South
China Sea west of Luzon. The disturbance was located in a monsoon
trough extending across the northern South China Sea and was quasi-
stationary. Most of the convection associated with the system was
well south of the LLCC under moderate to strong vertical shear.
A STWO issued by JTWC at 0600 UTC on 17 May mentioned that deep
convection appeared to be associated with linear convergence south
of the LLCC. A QuikScat pass showed that the stronger winds were
located on the outer edge of the circulation. A SSM/I pass at
1247 UTC depicted improved organization with deep convection wrapping
around the northern periphery of the LLCC. Synoptic data and satellite
imagery indicated that the center was located over land about 100 nm
northwest of Manila. CIMSS vertical shear charts and a 200-mb analysis
indicated a favorable environment for strengthening, and JTWC upgraded
the potential for development to Fair in a special STWO at 2000 UTC.
(PAGASA initiated warnings on the developing system at 1800 UTC, naming
it Tropical Depression Biring.)
By 0600 UTC on the 18th the LLCC was located just off the north-
eastern coast of Luzon. JTWC issued a Formation Alert at 0700 UTC as
animated visible imagery showed a continued increase in convective
organization. At this stage the disturbance displayed monsoon
depression characteristics with the deepest convection and strongest
winds on the periphery of the LLCC, which was helping to anchor a
reverse monsoon trough pattern. Later on 18 May the depression began
to develop rapidly about 125 nm northeast of Port San Vincente in the
Philippines with the LLCC located about 15 nm west of some deep
convection. JTWC wrote the first warning on TD-02W at this time with
an initial intensity of 30 kts, based upon satellite CI numbers of
30 and 35 kts. JMA upgraded the depression to Tropical Storm Longwang
at 19/0000 UTC with 40-kt winds (10-min avg) and centered about 225 nm
northeast of the northeastern tip of Luzon. JTWC upgraded the system
to a tropical storm also at 0000 UTC. Deep convection was wrapping
around the northern quadrant of the LLCC but was inhibited along the
western edge by westerly shear. A SSM/I pass at 2153 UTC depicted
a solid band of convection south through northeast of the center with
weak convection in the other quadrants.
Longwang reached its peak intensity of 40 kts (per JTWC analysis)
at 0600 UTC when gales extended outward 45 nm to the southeast of the
center and 35 nm elsewhere. The storm was centered about 250 nm south-
southwest of Okinawa and moving northeastward at 13 kts. A 200-mb
analysis indicated that the upper-level ridge was situated to the
south of the system, near Luzon, with weak diffluence noted over the
storm. Six hours later Longwang was moving rather quickly (21 kts) to
the northeast about 170 nm south-southeast of Okinawa. The MSW was
still estimated at 40 kts based upon CI estimates of 35 and 45 kts, but
a 19/0908 UTC SSM/I pass depicted a weakened system with convection
displaced almost 50 nm east of an exposed LLCC. The western half of
the system was virtually cloud-free. At 1800 UTC JTWC dropped the
MSW to 35 kts, but JMA's peak 10-min avg intensity of 45 kts was
assigned at this time. The JMA analyzed position for 1800 UTC was
about one degree to the northeast of JTWC's position, and with the
storm undergoing strong southwesterly shearing, it seems likely that
the JMA analyst placed the LLCC underneath the convection.
By 20/0000 UTC JTWC had downgraded Longwang to a tropical depression
located about 355 nm east of Okinawa. The system exhibited a small
LLCC with the convection sheared to the northeast and was forecast to
track rapidly east-northeastward in mid-latitude westerly flow. Six
hours later the depression was becoming extratropical and merging with
a frontal boundary about 240 nm north-northwest of Iwo Jima as it raced
to the east-northeast at 39 kts.
***********************************************************************
NORTH INDIAN OCEAN (NIO) - Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea
Activity for May: No tropical cyclones
***********************************************************************
SOUTH INDIAN OCEAN (SIO) - South Indian Ocean West of Longitude 90E
Activity for May: No tropical cyclones
***********************************************************************
AUSTRALIAN REGION (AUG) - From Longitude 90E Eastward to Longitude 160E
Activity for May: 1 tropical LOW
Australian Region Activity for May
----------------------------------
A tropical disturbance formed on 20 May near Rennell Island in the
Solomon group and was assigned a number (24F) by the Fiji TCWC at
Nadi. The system subsequently drifted westward for a few days into
the Australian Region. A tight pressure gradient with a HIGH to the
south caused gales to be generated in the southern semicircle of the
system and Brisbane issued gale warnings for a couple of days. The
LOW drifted slowly westward and the final gale warning at 23/0000 UTC
placed the center only about 275 nm west of Rennell Island. The
highest Dvorak rating located by the author for this depression was
only T1.5.
***********************************************************************
SOUTHWEST PACIFIC (SWP) - South Pacific Ocean East of Longitude 160E
Activity for May: 2 tropical depressions
Southwest Pacific Activity for May
----------------------------------
There were no named tropical cyclones in the South Pacific region
during May, but there were a few depressions/disturbances which the
Fiji TCWC assigned numbers to. The first and longest-lived disturbance
was Tropical Depression 22F which formed on 3 May about 350 nm south-
east of American Samoa. Six hours later the center seems to have
reformed about 100 nm farther to the southeast. Initially, the LOW
was more extratropical in nature, lying under a 250-mb trough axis,
and, while designated as a tropical LOW in warnings, did not receive
a number until 5 May when there was an increase in convection fairly
close to the center. The depression remained quasi-stationary for
several days before drifting slowly to the west-southwest and
weakening. The final warning received by the author, at 08/1800 UTC,
placed the LOW's center about 500 nm south-southeast of American Samoa.
Gale warnings were issued for winds up to 40 kts in the southern
semicircle, but the highest Dvorak ratings assigned by JTWC and KGWC
were only T1.5. A track is included for this depression in the May
tropical cyclone tracks file.
Another disturbance between Fiji and Vanuatu was designated as
Tropical Disturbance 23F on 6 May. This system was briefly referred
to as a tropical depression, but was sheared and did not develop
further. No track is given for this system in the tracks file.
Finally, a third disturbance was designated as Tropical Disturbance
24F on 20 May near Rennell Island in the Solomon group. This location
is near 160E (the boundary of Brisbane's AOR) and the disturbance
subsequently drifted westward into the Australian Region where the
Brisbane TCWC issued gale warnings for a couple of days. More on this
system can be found in the Australian Region portion of this summary.
***********************************************************************
EXTRA FEATURE
In order to shorten the amount of typing in preparing the narrative
material, I have been in the habit of freely using abbreviations and
acronyms. I have tried to define most of these with the first usage
in a given summary, but I may have missed one now and then. Most of
these are probably understood by a majority of readers but perhaps a
few aren't clear to some. To remedy this I developed a Glossary of
Abbreviations and Acronyms which I first included in the July, 1998
summary. I don't normally include the Glossary in most months in
order to help keep them from being too long, but since May was a
relatively quiet month, I have included the Glossary at the end of
this summary following the Author's Note.
***********************************************************************
AUTHOR'S NOTE: This summary should be considered a very preliminary
overview of the tropical cyclones that occur in each month. The cyclone
tracks (provided separately) will generally be based upon operational
warnings issued by the various tropical cyclone warning centers. The
information contained therein may differ somewhat from the tracking and
intensity information obtained from a "best-track" file which is based
on a detailed post-seasonal analysis of all available data. Information
on where to find official "best-track" files from the various warning
centers will be passed along from time to time.
The track files are not being sent via e-mail. They can be retrieved
in the following manner:
(a) FTP to: hrd-type42.nhc.noaa.gov [140.90.176.206]
(b) Login as: anonymous
(c) For a password use your e-mail address
(d) Go to "data" subdirectory (Type: cd data)
(e) Set file type to ASCII (Type: ascii)
(f) Transfer file (Type: get remote_file_name local_file_name )
(The files will be named with an obvious nomenclature--using
May as an example: may00.tracks)
(g) To exit FTP, type: quit
Both the summaries and the track files are standard text files
created in DOS editor. Download to disk and use a viewer such as
Notepad or DOS editor to view the files.
The first summary in this series covered the month of October,
1997. If anyone wishes to retrieve any of the previous summaries,
they may be downloaded from the aforementioned FTP site at HRD. The
summary files are catalogued with the nomenclature: may00.sum, for
example.
Back issues can also be obtained from the following websites
(courtesy of Michael Bath, Michael V. Padua, Tom Berg, Michael
Pitt, and Rich Henning):
http://australiansevereweather.com/cyclones/>
http://www.geocities.com/capecanaveral/6825>
http://www.hurricanealley.net/>
http://www.qisfl.net/home/hurricanemike>
http://www.met.fsu.edu/gsc/Docs/Grads/henning/cyclones/>
Another website where much information about tropical cyclones may
be found is the website for the UK Meteorological Office. Their site
contains a lot of statistical information about tropical cyclones
globally on a monthly basis. The URL is:
http://www.met-office.gov.uk/sec2/sec2cyclone/sec2cyclone.html>
TROPICAL CYCLONE REPORTS AVAILABLE
I have discovered that JTWC now has available on its website the
complete Annual Tropical Cyclone Report (ATCR) for 1999 (1998-1999
season for the Southern Hemisphere). Also, ATCRs for earlier years
are available also.
The URL is: http://199.10.200.33/jtwc.html>
Also, TPC/NHC has available on its webpage nice "technicolor"
tracking charts for the 1999 Atlantic and Eastern North Pacific
tropical cyclones; also, preliminary storm reports for all the 1999
Atlantic and Eastern North Pacific cyclones are now available.
The URL is: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov>
Prepared by: Gary Padgett
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: 334-222-5327 (nights & weekends) / 850-882-2594 (weekdays)
***********************************************************************
***********************************************************************
GLOSSARY of ABBREVIATIONS and ACRONYMS
AOML/HRD - Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory/
Hurricane Research Division, located on Virginia Key, Miami,
Florida, U.S.A.
AOR - area of responsibility
CDO - central dense overcast
CI - current intensity
CIMSS - Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies
(University of Wisconsin-Madison)
CP - central pressure
CPHC - Central Pacific Hurricane Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A.
FLW - flight level wind (or winds)
FTP - file transfer protocol
HPC - Hydrometeorological Prediction Center, Camp Springs,
Maryland
IMD - India Meteorological Department (RSMC New Delhi, India)
JMA - Japanese Meteorological Agency (RSMC Tokyo, Japan)
JTWC - Joint Typhoon Warning Center, formerly on Guam, now at
Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
kt - knot = 1 nautical mile per hour
LLCC - low-level circulation center
m - meter, or metre
mb - millibar, numerically equivalent to hectopascal (hPa)
MFR - Meteo France on Reunion Island
mm - millimeter
MSW - maximum sustained wind(s) (either 1-min avg or 10-min avg)
nm - nautical mile = 6076.12 feet or 1852.0 meters
NPMOC - Naval Pacific Meteorological and Oceanographic Center, Pearl
Harbor, Hawaii, U.S.A.
PAGASA - Philippines' Atmospheric, Geophysical & Astronomical Services
Administration
RSMC - Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre
SST - sea surface temperature
STS - severe tropical storm (MSW greater than 47 kts)
STWO - Significant Tropical Weather Outlook - bulletin issued
daily by JTWC giving information about various areas of
disturbed weather and the potential for tropical cyclone
development
TC - tropical cyclone
TCWC - Tropical Cyclone Warning Centre (generic term)
TD - tropical depression
TPC/NHC - Tropical Prediction Center/National Hurricane Center, Miami,
Florida, U.S.A.
TS - tropical storm
WMO - World Meteorological Organization, headquartered at Geneva,
Switzerland
UTC - Universal Time Coordinated, equivalent to Greenwich Mean Time
or Zulu (Z)
|
Document: summ0005.htm
Updated: 4th January 2007 |
[Australian Severe Weather index] [Copyright Notice] [Email Contacts] [Search This Site] |